I'd markwell the prior topic but it's late...
Each view you did when moving the window of the network kml amounted to a small PQ. Now imaging someone constantly panning the window, over and over and over and over.. is it still hard to imaging that maybe that was a hit to the system?
Now to the people that balk at the 200 user count. The 200 user count was a number that I gave to Nate and Jeremy when we were looking at the system resources.. That number can be explained. I kept detailed logs of what IP was hitting and when it was hitting. I can tell you how many people used it and how many times they panned the map. The 200# was based on someone panning the map more than 500 times a day and has stuck now as the battle cry of people in this thread. That number doesn't count the many people who panned the map once or twice or even 100 times.
Yes the feature was a great addition to the site and yes, once again I'll say that I'm sad it had to go for now, I am looking for a better way to provide that type of functionality, though.
-Raine
Esto es lo que dicen los sheriff del condado...
Vamos que el tema de los 200 usuarios, son 200 usuarios diarios que "menean" el mapa mas de 500 veces al día...
, básicamente quieren camuflarlo como un problema de recursos e intentarán ofrecer una alternativa en breve...